APC CONVENTION AND SOME TRIVIAL OVERTONES
By: Reporter
The
All Progressives Congress (APC) national chairmanship race has preoccupied the
attention of observers since the preparations for the national convention
started. The event which has been reported from different views of the officials of the party is in the news again to have some irrelevant overtones.
Is
there any likelihood that the abortive tenure elongation plot has been replaced
by a plot to have a National Working Committee that can overwhelm the incoming
National Chairman of All Progressives Congress (APC)? Some concerned party members
think so.
As the
APC prepares for its national convention scheduled for Saturday (June 23),
irreverent undercurrents spurred by the abortive tenure elongation plot appear
to be at work still. In due course, current fears may soon turn out to be
either justified or not.
Altogether,
some 160 aspirants are now jostling for positions and lobbying the 6,800
delegates for support. The chances of former Edo State governor, Comrade Adams
Oshiomole, appear bright. Yet, there are suspicions that other interests may be
working on a long-term plan to dilute or neutralize his powers as APC’s
national chairman.
Indeed,
for a party with such large followership, as the APC has, it would be naïve to
assume that everyone genuinely subscribes to the high ideals it pursues.
Nonetheless, it would be a sad development for numerous progressive-minded
members who had witnessed the unfolding narrow agenda before, to now be
subjected to yet another manipulative agenda. Even people outside the party
were shocked when some elements once hatched plots to water down the influence
of the party leader who created the template for the APC and its eventual
electoral victory.
Nevertheless,
the needless intrigues surrounding the tenure elongation plot aimed towards
artificially sustaining Chief John Odigie-Oyegun in office as National Chairman
evolved until it was effectively checked.
Following
the failure of the effort invested in the tenure elongation plot that would
have seen Oyegun in office till well after next Saturday’s national convention,
three broad tendencies seem apparent across the party. The first comprises
those who feel concerned about the capacity of the party to conduct two
conventions in a matter of few months and still keep its cohesion. Then, there
are those who had hoped that having pocketed the national leadership of the
party, they’ll subsequently sail through the primary of the party, waving a
banner of conquest. Yet, there are others who hoped that the few months’ grace
would afford the party the time to craft a better reward system and sort out
itself properly.
Looking
back now, most party members would readily agree that President Muhammadu
Buhari saved the party’s soul and ensured its survival by the decisive act of
declining to endorse Oyegun’s tenure elongation and then, speaking against the
idea.
As
commendable as this appears to be, it is not without consequences. From the
perspective of many party members, especially those who do not feel enamoured
by Oyegun, one major consequence, they say, is that the chairman and his
loyalists felt so hard done and were ready for the house to collapse; hence,
the shoddy congresses in various states. Even in Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s base,
Lagos State, an attempt was made to encourage a parallel exco. It is also felt
that several governors had been initially conscripted into putting pressure on
President Buhari towards adopting Oyegun, but the entire game plan unraveled
woefully.
Now,
without a tenure elongation plot, the incoming national chairman’s seemingly
wide powers can be effectively checkmated by an NWC dominated by irreverent
thoughts. Currently, filling of the position of APC’s National Chairman seems
very settled, with maximum support for ex-governor and labour leader,
Oshiomhole.
Provisions
of Article 14 in APC’s constitution accords the National Chairman much powers
and influence, as it states that the National Chairman shall: be the Chief
Executive, Accounting Officer and shall preside over the meetings of the
National Executive Committee and the National Working Committee of the party;
provide good and effective leadership to the party; uphold the Constitution and
defend the name, policies and programmes of the party; be a signatory to the
accounts of the party; direct the due execution of the programmes of the party;
give lawful directives to all officers, organs, and members of the party at all
levels; have a casting vote in the event of a tie in the meetings of the party
over which he presides; ensure the implementation of the directives of all
superior organs of the party, namely the National Convention, the Board of
Trustees, the National Executive Committee, the National Working Committee and
the National Caucus; and perform such other functions as may be assigned to him
from time to time by the National convention, Board of Trustees, National
Executive Committee and/or the National Working Committee.
Conscious
of the National Chairman’s wide and deep authority, perhaps, one body through
which his influence can be tactically eroded is the National Working Committee.
According to some, the very influential former governor from the Southsouth and
his loyalists may have perfected plans to dominate the NWC and invoke its
powers whenever such is desired.
Article 13.4 of the APC’s constitution outlines the roles and powers of the NWC as follows:
“The National Working Committee shall be responsible for the Administration of the Party and putting into effect the decisions of the National Executive Committee. To that end, the National Working Committee shall carry out the day to day running of the affairs of the party.
“It shall in particular: prepare the agenda for the National Convention subject to ratification by the National Executive Committee; prepare and submit reports and budgets for consideration of the National Convention subject to the ratification of the National Executive Committee; provide financial guidelines for the approval of the National Convention subject to the ratification of the National Executive Committee; propose policies and programmes for the Party, which shall be considered by the National Executive Committee and approved by the Board of Trustees; propose to the National Executive Committee, Party electoral Regulations, to govern the conduct of elections to all party offices at every level and to 30 govern the Procedure for selecting candidates for elective offices, subject to the provisions of this Constitution; invite such person(s) as it deems necessary, desirable or expedient, to attend meeting(s) and take part in deliberations provided that such invited person(s) shall have no voting right; have power to make Standing Orders for the approval of the National Executive Committee and ratification by the Board of Trustees; deal with any other matters referred to it by the National Executive Committee or the Board of Trustees; deal with appeals and other problems referred to it by the State Working Committee, and or coming from the zones and states of the federation; establish Ad-hoc and, or Standing Committees of the Party and appoint members to such Committees; examine the actions, policies and programmes pursued and legislations made by the Governments of the Federation from time to time in order to determine whether or not they are in accordance with the manifesto and the Constitution of the party and if not to make recommendations to the National Executive Committee for its action; recommend for approval by the National Executive Committee, the proportion of income from subscription from each Ward, Local Government Area/Area Council and States that shall be remitted to the National Office.
(PremiumTimes)
Comments
Post a Comment